This as Major conflict with Nature, when aspects of Homosexuality are clearly a element of Human history, and Evolution.
In the sense defined by French Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser,
ideology is "the imagined existence (or idea) of things as it relates to the real conditions of existence".
" Ideology is a system of belief or core values. Every human being has a personal ideology and belief system cultivated from upbringing, experiences and reflection.
Heterosexism as a set of beliefs and attitudes relies on a core tenet according to which homosexuality and bisexuality do not normally exist and, as such, constitute mental illnesses or deviant behaviors. Within a heterosexist ideology or mindset, the concept of sexual orientation is rejected or deemed irrelevant. A set of more nuanced heterosexist views, which some may consider faith, dogma, universal truths, natural law, appeals to authority, or popular beliefs, but others consider to be conventional wisdom or sociobiological knowledge can include, among others, the following:
excerpt from ↑ ;
Following on the heels of Marx, the Italian activist, journalist, and intellectual Antonio Gramsci offered a more developed theory of ideology to help explain why the revolution did not occur. Gramsci, offering his theory of cultural hegemony, reasoned that dominant ideology had a stronger hold on consciousness and society than Marx had imagined.
Gramsci's theory focused on the central role played by the social institution of education in spreading the dominant ideology and maintaining the power of the ruling class. Educational institutions, Gramsci argued, teach ideas, beliefs, values, and even identities that reflect the interests of the ruling class, and produce compliant and obedient members of society that serve the interests of that class. This type of rule is what Gramsci called cultural hegemony.
excerpt from ↑ ;
Ideological state apparatuses (ISA)
According to Althusser, the obviousness that people (you and I) are subjects is an effect of ideology. Althusser believes that there are two functions of interpellation. One function of ideology is "recognition" and the other function, its inverse, is "misrecognition". Below are a few concrete illustrations that Althusser provides to further explain the two functions:
" Educational ISA, in particular, assume a dominant role in a capitalist economy, and conceal and mask the ideology of the ruling class behind the "liberating qualities" of education, so that the hidden agendas of the ruling class are inconspicuous to most teachers, students, parents and other interested members of society.:1493–1496 Althusser said that the school has supplanted the church as the crucial ISA for indoctrination, which augments the reproduction of the relations of production (i.e. the capitalist relations of exploitation) by training the students to become a source of labour power, who work for and under capitalists."
"A mindset may be so firmly established that it creates a powerful incentive within these people or groups to continue to adopt or accept prior behaviors, choices, or tools"
For example; My Mindset concerning my gender identity would be " Third-gender", my sexual identity is "female" or to only be in the female role. For example when a male is allowing me to sexually pleasure him by way of
masturbation (hand-job), performing fellatio on him, or he is penetrating me anally;
it seems non-homosexual,
because I am psychosexually female like, or I have no desire to be like a man sexually.
In Essense, I am so psychosexually female like, it is so much against my ideology,
it would be next to impossible for me to even get a "Erection " in order to be in male role,
I have no real desire to have a orgasm, or ejaculate
For example, last time I tried having sex with a female, I could pleasure her orally,yet was unable to get
get erect, as that felt wrong and against my ideology,
Even by orally giving her pleasure, I felt like I was a Lesbian
or it felt like a homosexual act.
And from my experience ; " How a person is sexually, their ideology of it , greatly reflexs just how;
" primitive they are or they are not "
I myself have always considered myself as psychologically female like, psychosexually female, with male body
Under the modern Western concept of homosexuality, sex between a member of the third gender and a masculine male would be termed as homosexuality. None of the ancient cultures, however, saw it that way. Third gender meant (and still means in many cultures) a different sex category altogether. Third gender males are not considered men, either by themselves or by their society.
Sex or sexual desire between the third gender and masculine males have always been considered as heterosexual rather than homosexual.
What a rough life, yet we all are different in so many,many ways- host, Hannah Brooks does great job in interviewing
↑ Aprox; 1:50, what kind of human beings shoves two off cliff to death, because they( two males) where having sex ?
As much as it hurts, I think the only way to deal with some people is the way Woodrow does it in scene above.
We are fooling ourselves if we think we are truly ....."Civilized to a high degree", a long,long rough road is ahead.
One thing I battled most my life is major long term depression, as Robert states, it's very biological in many cases, thus why would anyone think transsexualism, not be biological as well....it is our brains formed differently
Robert Sapolsky, states the World health organization estimates by 2025 depression will be 2nd most debilitating illness world wide. Means We are really doing something very Wrong!
And it sure ain't due to a few Third-gender / transgender peoples
More likely from Misery seeks Company !........??
For myself , the above paper greatly represents a " poorly developed society ", in a profoundly symbolic way.
I think the below video where psychologist Jan Derksen and philosopher Katrine Smiet talk about,
Jordan Peterson, his seemly worry of the break from " traditional ' views on gender identity, helps explain where we are culturally on the topic of " transgenderism"
Most Important thing is to understand Peterson is intelligent, yet extremely bias, and ideological - my opinion